The Guardian: Julian Assange Answers Your Questions
03.12.10
I grew up in a Queensland country town where people spoke their minds bluntly. They distrusted big government as something that could be corrupted if not watched carefully. The dark days of corruption in the Queensland government before the Fitzgerald inquiry are testimony to what happens when the politicians gag the media from reporting the truth. These things have stayed with me. WikiLeaks was created around these core values. The idea, conceived in Australia, was to use internet technologies in new ways to report the truth. WikiLeaks coined a new type of journalism: scientific journalism. We work with other media outlets to bring people the news, but also to prove it is true. Scientific journalism allows you to read a news story, then to click online to see the original document it is based on. That way you can judge for yourself: Is the story true? Did the journalist report it accurately? Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest. WikiLeaks has revealed some hard truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars, and broken stories about corporate corruption.
08.12.10
via thedailywhat:

Tweets of the Day: @Anon_Operation — the Twitter account being used to coordinate and report on the activities associated with the pro-Wikileaks hacking initiative “Operation Payback” — has been suspended by Twitter following reports of a credit card number list that supposedly leaked following today’s cyber-attack on MasterCard (Guardian says reports of valid CC# lists are “rubbish”).
So far on Operation Payback’s recently-revised checklist: PayPal, MasterCard, Visa, Swiss banks, and Sarah Palin. Is Twitter next?
[@tamsinchan.]
UPDATE: Psst… They’re back.

via thedailywhat:

Tweets of the Day: @Anon_Operation — the Twitter account being used to coordinate and report on the activities associated with the pro-Wikileaks hacking initiative “Operation Payback” — has been suspended by Twitter following reports of a credit card number list that supposedly leaked following today’s cyber-attack on MasterCard (Guardian says reports of valid CC# lists are “rubbish”).

So far on Operation Payback’s recently-revised checklist: PayPal, MasterCard, Visa, Swiss banks, and Sarah Palin. Is Twitter next?

[@tamsinchan.]

UPDATE: Psst… They’re back.

(Source: thedailywhat)

08.12.10

Then there is Julian Assange, who is a pure-dye underground computer hacker. Julian doesn’t break into systems at the moment, but he’s not an “ex-hacker,” he’s the silver-plated real deal, the true avant-garde. Julian is a child of the underground hacker milieu, the digital-native as twenty-first century cypherpunk. As far as I can figure, Julian has never found any other line of work that bore any interest for him.

Through dint of years of cunning effort, Assange has worked himself into a position where his “computer crimes” are mainly political. They’re probably not even crimes. They are “leaks.” Leaks are nothing special. They are tidbits from the powerful that every journalist gets on occasion, like crumbs of fishfood on the top of the media tank.

Julian Assange doesn’t want to be in power; he has no people skills at all, and nobody’s ever gonna make him President Vaclav Havel. He’s certainly not in for the money, because he wouldn’t know what to do with the cash; he lives out of a backpack, and his daily routine is probably sixteen hours online. He’s not gonna get better Google searches by spending more on his banned MasterCard. I don’t even think Assange is all that big on ego; I know authors and architects, so I’ve seen much worse than Julian in that regard. He’s just what he is; he’s something we donâ’t yet have words for.

He’s a different, modern type of serious troublemaker. He’s certainly not a “terrorist,” because nobody is scared and no one got injured. He’s not a “spy,” because nobody spies by revealing the doings of a government to its own civil population. He is orthogonal. He’s asymmetrical. He panics people in power and he makes them look stupid. And I feel sorry for them. But sorrier for the rest of us.

Well…every once in a while, a situation that’s one-in-a-thousand is met by a guy who is one in a million. It may be that Assange is, somehow, up to this situation. Maybe he’s gonna grow in stature by the massive trouble he has caused. Saints, martyrs, dissidents and freaks are always wild-cards, but sometimes they’re the only ones who can clear the general air. Sometimes they become the catalyst for historical events that somehow had to happen. They don’t have to be nice guys; that’s not the point. Julian Assange did this; he direly wanted it to happen. He planned it in nitpicky, obsessive detail. Here it is; a planetary hack.

I don’t have a lot of cheery hope to offer about his all-too-compelling gesture, but I dare to hope he’s everything he thinks he is, and much, much, more.

- Bruce Sterling, The Blast Shack (via underpaidgenius)

“Uncle” Bruce Sterling is one of my favorite tech/digital/futurist writers & thinkers. His end of SXSW Interactive discourses are legendary - even in SXSW’s current douchebaggery state. He’s always worth a read and listen.

Uncle Bruce has now dashed off a brillant missive sans any romanticism with complete background context and cold, in-depth analysis. Sterling then outlines the logical implications of what Wikileaks REALLY means for us globally. THIS IS A MUST READ. 

23.12.10

Via sirmitchell:

MSNBC’s exclusive interview with Julian Assange. Wether you are for or against him, I think this is pretty important to watch.

It’s especially interesting, as Julian is able to speak without being interrupted, or barraged with talking points. I also love what he said about Mike Huckabee. 

(Source: sirmitchell)

23.12.10

Facts. Journalism. Lies. And Wikileaks.

FACTS should always win out. Sometimes they do. Sometimes they don’t.

I thought Jessica Yellin was smarter than that. Apparently & predictably she is just another in a long line of talking heads on cable news networks repeating interest groups’ talking points or whatever her producer is saying in her ear piece. Sad.

Via dailybunch:

At this point it’s so easy, I shouldn’t award any points. But Glenn Greenwald’s thorough clowning of this pathetic CNN on-air personality and the former Bush Administration stooge set up as the opposite in the usual left-right crossfire is just too good because of how well Greenwald manages to avoid any emotion. It’s just cold, calculating facts—which we know is like kryptonite to anyone on CNN not named Anderson Cooper.

[via seanbonner]

28.12.10
via shortformblog:

soupsoup:

seanbonner:

Unpublished chatlogs have no further info about any private FTP servers or any details about the relationship between Manning and Assange. Check it.

Sean was able to accomplish in a matter of a couple of tweets what Greenwald has been attempting to do for months: get Wired to clear Assange of having direct cooperation with Manning, the very thing the United States government wants to use to nail Assange on conspiracy charges.

And to think, Glenn Greenwald and Kevin Poulsen wouldn’t have had to snipe over one another had Poulsen actually been posed (and answered) these questions. Sean Bonner, master mediator.


Wired (Kevin Poulsen, Evan Hansen) finally provides info after this week’s interwebs kerfuffle with Glenn Greenwald…after Sean Bonner asks the question? Huh?  

via shortformblog:

soupsoup:

seanbonner:

Unpublished chatlogs have no further info about any private FTP servers or any details about the relationship between Manning and Assange. Check it.

Sean was able to accomplish in a matter of a couple of tweets what Greenwald has been attempting to do for months: get Wired to clear Assange of having direct cooperation with Manning, the very thing the United States government wants to use to nail Assange on conspiracy charges.

And to think, Glenn Greenwald and Kevin Poulsen wouldn’t have had to snipe over one another had Poulsen actually been posed (and answered) these questions. Sean Bonner, master mediator.

Wired (Kevin Poulsen, Evan Hansen) finally provides info after this week’s interwebs kerfuffle with Glenn Greenwald…after Sean Bonner asks the question? Huh?  

(via joshsternberg)

30.12.10
Assange Alerts His Hostages
30.12.10
Why WikiLeaks Matters
19.01.11
the United States must invest in populations, not in dictators
26.01.11